Unconscious biases, as explored by Shankar Vedantam in "The Hidden Brain," are an integral concept to understand when exploring AI ethics.  These biases exert a pervasive influence over our perceptions and actions, often operating without our awareness, and their ramifications extend deeply into our personal and societal interactions.

An eye-opening example from the book underscores the profound impact of unconscious bias. Research conducted at a Montreal day-care center revealed that even toddlers as young as three years old displayed racial categorization tendencies. These young children consistently associated white faces with positive attributes and black faces with negative ones, providing early evidence of the emergence of racial bias in their cognitive processes. Vedantam emphasizes that these associations, though observed in very young children, are not inherently biological but are predominantly shaped by the cultural and environmental influences they encounter during their formative years.

Another powerful illustration presented in the book revolves around a study involving job applications. The applications were identical in qualifications, but they carried different names indicating various races. Perhaps unsurprisingly, applications with white-sounding names received significantly more callbacks for interviews compared to those with African-American-sounding names. This experiment starkly underscores how unconscious bias can sway hiring decisions, even among individuals who consciously uphold principles of equality and fairness.

Moreover, Vedantam adeptly portrays how unconscious biases permeate our daily interactions. Our brains, in their quest for efficiency, often rely on shortcuts and stereotypes to rapidly process information, resulting in biased judgments. For example, we might unconsciously associate specific clothing styles with negative traits, leading to unjust treatment or unwarranted fear of individuals who pose no genuine threat.

Even in the realm of healthcare, where doctors are typically well-intentioned and highly trained, unconscious biases can insidiously influence diagnosis and treatment decisions. Research indicates that racial disparities in treatment exist, with African American patients being less likely to be referred for specific medical procedures despite presenting similar symptoms. Additionally, Vedantam highlights the role of media in perpetuating unconscious biases. Biased portrayals of certain groups in the media reinforce stereotypes and significantly shape public opinion, thereby nurturing prejudice and discrimination.

Despite the omnipresence of unconscious biases, Vedantam offers a glimmer of hope by emphasizing our capacity to confront and overcome them. This journey begins with introspection and a willingness to challenge our own biases, as self-awareness serves as the crucial first step in recognizing and questioning automatic associations and judgments. Actively seeking diverse perspectives and experiences serves as a valuable strategy to broaden our understanding of others and mitigate the influence of unconscious bias. He also discusses effective strategies and interventions to mitigate the impact of unconscious biases. Techniques such as blind auditions and blind evaluations in hiring processes have proven successful in removing the influence of biases, focusing solely on an individual's talent and merit.

As we navigate a world increasingly shaped by artificial intelligence, it's essential to recognize that AI systems can also inherit and perpetuate these unconscious biases. Just as we strive to confront and mitigate our own biases, we must design and train AI algorithms to do the same. A conscious effort to create AI systems that are free from the biases ingrained in our society is pivotal to building a fair, just, and equitable future where both humans and machines coexist harmoniously. Vedantam's work inspires us to confront our own hidden biases and actively strive for a more conscious and just world, both in our human interactions and in the technology we create.

Source: 
Vedantam, S. (2009). The Hidden Brain: How Our Unconscious Minds Elect Presidents, Control Markets, Wage Wars, and Save Our Lives. 
Buy now! 

​​Before we can delve into the intricacies and specifics of AI ethics and biases, it is crucial to establish a foundational understanding of the biases inherent in AI and the reasons for their existence. This blog post draws insights from two informative articles to shed light on this complex issue. The first article, authored by Karen Hao and published in MIT Technology Review in February 2019, underscores that AI bias cannot be solely attributed to biased training data; instead, it has nuanced origins throughout the deep-learning process. The second article by Jake Silberg and James Manyika at McKinsey, published in June 2019, explores opportunities to mitigate human biases through AI and the pressing need to improve AI systems to prevent the perpetuation of human and societal biases. These articles emphasize that while AI holds the potential to alleviate biases, it also carries the risk of exacerbating them if not managed carefully, making it essential to understand the mechanics of AI bias.

Cause of AI Bias:
AI bias is a multifaceted challenge originating from various sources beyond biased training data. It arises from human biases that impact decision-making, both consciously and unconsciously. Biased data, reflecting historical prejudices or societal inequities, can perpetuate these biases when used to train AI models. Additionally, biases can infiltrate data collection processes, such as oversampling specific demographics due to over-policing. The choices made during algorithm development, like selecting attributes for consideration, can introduce bias, affecting model predictions and fairness. Defining fairness in AI is complex, as there are various definitions with inherent trade-offs between them, making it challenging for AI systems to conform to multiple fairness metrics simultaneously.

Addressing AI Bias:
Mitigating AI bias is an ongoing challenge that demands careful consideration. It involves various strategies and considerations. Using AI to reduce human bias is one approach, enabling more objective decision-making by relying on relevant data rather than subjective factors. Transparency and accountability are vital, requiring organizations to establish processes for testing and mitigating bias in AI systems, including auditing data and models for fairness. Collaboration between humans and AI is essential, with human judgment complementing AI recommendations in decision-making processes. Interdisciplinary collaboration across fields, including ethics and social sciences, is necessary to develop standards for bias and fairness. Encouraging diversity in the AI community can provide unique insights and perspectives in addressing bias issues.

Conclusion:
AI bias is a multifaceted challenge that necessitates a comprehensive approach. While AI has the potential to reduce human biases, it also carries the risk of amplifying them. Achieving fairness and ethics in AI requires ongoing research, interdisciplinary collaboration, transparency, and accountability.

Sources:
Karen Hao, "This is how AI bias really happens—and why it’s so hard to fix," MIT Technology Review, February 4, 2019.
Jake Silberg and James Manyika, "Tackling bias in artificial intelligence (and in humans)," McKinsey Global Institute, June 6, 2019.